Follow
Anastasios Sarampalis
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Objective measures of listening effort: Effects of background noise and noise reduction
A Sarampalis, S Kalluri, B Edwards, E Hafter
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2009
5992009
Listening effort with cochlear implant simulations
C Pals, A Sarampalis, D Başkent
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2013
1362013
MarkeTrak 10 (MT10) survey results demonstrate high satisfaction with and benefits from hearing aids
EM Picou
Seminars in hearing 41 (01), 021-036, 2020
862020
Validation of a simple response-time measure of listening effort
C Pals, A Sarampalis, H van Rijn, D Başkent
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138 (3), EL187-EL192, 2015
722015
Cognitive compensation of speech perception with hearing impairment, cochlear implants, and aging: How and to what degree can it be achieved?
D Başkent, J Clarke, C Pals, MR Benard, P Bhargava, J Saija, ...
Trends in Hearing 20, 2331216516670279, 2016
642016
Auditory attention and filters
ER Hafter, A Sarampalis, P Loui
Auditory perception of sound sources, 115-142, 2008
492008
Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report
M Chatterjee, A Sarampalis, SI Oba
Hearing Research 222 (1-2), 100-107, 2006
492006
Emerging technologies, market segments, and MarkeTrak 10 insights in hearing health technology
B Edwards
Seminars in Hearing 41 (01), 037-054, 2020
462020
Meta-analysis on the identification of linguistic and emotional prosody in cochlear implant users and vocoder simulations
MK Everhardt, A Sarampalis, M Coler, D Baskent, W Lowie
Ear and hearing 41 (5), 1092-1102, 2020
332020
Effect of spectral channels on speech recognition, comprehension, and listening effort in cochlear-implant users
C Pals, A Sarampalis, A Beynon, T Stainsby, D Başkent
Trends in hearing 24, 2331216520904617, 2020
202020
Does signal degradation affect top–down processing of speech?
A Wagner, C Pals, CM de Blecourt, A Sarampalis, D Başkent
Physiology, psychoacoustics and cognition in normal and impaired hearing …, 2016
202016
Effects of additional low-pass–filtered speech on listening effort for noise-band–vocoded speech in quiet and in noise
C Pals, A Sarampalis, M van Dijk, D Baskent
Ear and hearing 40 (1), 3-17, 2019
112019
Cognitive effects of noise reduction strategies
A Sarampalis, S Kalluri, BW Edwards, ER Hafter
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (5_Supplement), 3239-3239, 2006
62006
Perception of L2 lexical stress in words degraded by a cochlear implant simulation
MK Everhardt, A Sarampalis, M Coler, D Başkent, W Lowie
Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences …, 2019
42019
The effects of acute tryptophan depletion on speech and behavioural mimicry in individuals at familial risk for depression
K Hogenelst, A Sarampalis, NP Leander, BCN Müller, RA Schoevers, ...
Journal of psychopharmacology 30 (3), 303-311, 2016
42016
Effect of spectral resolution on speech intelligibility, comprehension, and listening effort in cochlear-implant users
C Pals, A Sarampalis, A Beynon, T Stainsby, D Başkent
Listening effort: The hidden costs and benefits of cochlear implants, 84-107, 2016
42016
Interpretation of prosodically marked focus in cochlear implant-simulated speech by non-native listeners
MK Everhardt, A Sarampalis, M Coler, D Başkent, W Lowie
Speech Prosody 2022, 2022
32022
Speech prosody: the musical, magical quality of speech
MK Everhardt, A Sarampalis, M Coler, D Başkent, W Lowie
Frontiers for Young Minds 10, 698575, 2022
32022
Working-memory, alpha-theta oscillations and musical training in older age: Research perspectives for speech-on-speech perception
R Gray, A Sarampalis, D Başkent, EE Harding
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 14, 806439, 2022
22022
Foreign Language Acquisition in Adolescent Cochlear Implant Users
MK Everhardt, DE Jung, B Stiensma, W Lowie, D Başkent, A Sarampalis
Ear and hearing 45 (1), 174-185, 2024
12024
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20