| Defining and operationalizing the construct of pragmatic competence: Review and recommendations VT Laughlin, J Wain, J Schmidgall ETS Research Report Series 2015 (1), 1-43, 2015 | 118 | 2015 |
| Review of Pearson Test of English Academic: Building an assessment use argument H Wang, I Choi, J Schmidgall, LF Bachman Language Testing 29 (4), 603-619, 2012 | 38 | 2012 |
| Predicting communicative effectiveness in the international workplace: Support for TOEIC® Speaking test scores from linguistic laypersons J Schmidgall, DE Powers Language Testing 38 (2), 302-325, 2021 | 17 | 2021 |
| Articulating and Evaluating Validity Arguments for the TOEIC® Tests JE Schmidgall ETS Research Report Series 2017 (1), 1-9, 2017 | 17 | 2017 |
| Technology and high‐stakes language testing JE Schmidgall, DE Powers The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning, 317-331, 2017 | 17 | 2017 |
| The Importance of English Writing Skills in the International Workplace. Research Memorandum. ETS RM-20-07. S Lee, J Schmidgall Educational Testing Service, 2020 | 16 | 2020 |
| Designing a prototype tablet‐based learning‐oriented assessment for middle school English learners: An evidence‐centered design approach CA Chapelle, J Schmidgall, A Lopez, I Blood, J Wain, Y Cho, A Hutchison, ... ETS Research Report Series 2018 (1), 1-55, 2018 | 16 | 2018 |
| Defining and operationalizing the construct of pragmatic competence: Review and recommendations (ETS Research Report No. RR-15-06) V Timpe Laughlin, J Wain, J Schmidgall Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. doi: http://dx. doi. org/10.1002 …, 2015 | 16 | 2015 |
| Modeling speaker proficiency, comprehensibility, and perceived competence in a language use domain JE Schmidgall University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 | 14 | 2013 |
| TOEIC® Writing test scores as indicators of the functional adequacy of writing in the international workplace: Evaluation by linguistic laypersons J Schmidgall, DE Powers Assessing Writing 46, 100492, 2020 | 11 | 2020 |
| Justifying the Construct Definition for a New Language Proficiency Assessment: The Redesigned TOEIC Bridge® Tests—Framework Paper J Schmidgall, ME Oliveri, T Duke, E Carter Grissom ETS Research Report Series 2019 (1), 1-20, 2019 | 11 | 2019 |
| Chinese users’ perceptions of the use of automated scoring for a speaking practice test X Xi, J Schmidgall, Y Wang Assessing Chinese learners of English: Language constructs, consequences and …, 2016 | 9 | 2016 |
| Screener tests need validation too: Weighing an argument for test use against practical concerns JE Schmidgall, EP Getman, J Zu Language Testing 35 (4), 583-607, 2018 | 8 | 2018 |
| The Consistency of TOEIC® Speaking Scores Across Ratings and Tasks JE Schmidgall ETS Research Report Series 2017 (1), 1-8, 2017 | 7 | 2017 |
| DEVELOPMENT OF THE REDESIGNEDTOEIC BRIDGE® TESTS P Everson, T Duke, PG Gomez, EC Grissom, E Park, J Schmidgall The Research Foundation, 1, 2021 | 5 | 2021 |
| Validation of language assessments J Schmidgall, X Xi The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 1-13, 2012 | 5 | 2012 |
| Assessing academic listening S Papageorgiou, J Schmidgall, L Harding, S Nissan, R French Assessing academic English for higher education admissions, 61-106, 2021 | 3 | 2021 |
| The Redesigned TOEIC Bridge® Tests: Relations to Test‐Taker Perceptions of Proficiency in English J Schmidgall ETS Research Report Series 2020 (1), 1-27, 2020 | 3 | 2020 |
| Making the Case for the Quality and Use of a New Language Proficiency Assessment: Validity Argument for the Redesigned TOEIC Bridge® Tests J Schmidgall, J Cid, E Carter Grissom, L Li ETS Research Report Series 2021 (1), 1-22, 2021 | 2 | 2021 |
| Best practices for comparing TOEIC® Speaking test scores to other assessments and standards: A score user’s guide J Schmidgall Research Memorandum No. RM-18-05). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 2018 | 2 | 2018 |
