Global Warming’s Five Germanys. A Typology of Germans’ Views on Climate Change and their Patterns of Media Use and Information J Metag, T Füchslin, MS Schäfer Public Understanding of Science, 2017 | 251 | 2017 |
The different audiences of science communication: A segmentation analysis of the Swiss population’s perceptions of science and their information and media use patterns MS Schäfer, T Füchslin, J Metag, S Kristiansen, A Rauchfleisch Public understanding of science 27 (7), 836-856, 2018 | 152 | 2018 |
Perceptions of climate change imagery: Evoked salience and self-efficacy in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria J Metag, MS Schäfer, T Füchslin, T Barsuhn, K Kleinen-von Königslöw Science Communication 38 (2), 197-227, 2016 | 137 | 2016 |
Framing emerging technologies: risk perceptions of nanotechnology in the German press A Donk, J Metag, M Kohring, F Marcinkowski Science Communication 34 (1), 5-29, 2012 | 117 | 2012 |
The special case of Switzerland: Swiss politicians on Twitter A Rauchfleisch, J Metag New Media & Society 18 (10), 2413-2431, 2016 | 109 | 2016 |
Technophobia towards emerging technologies? A comparative analysis of the media coverage of nanotechnology in Austria, Switzerland and Germany J Metag, F Marcinkowski Journalism 15 (4), 463-481, 2014 | 83 | 2014 |
Why do candidates use online media in constituency campaigning? An application of the theory of planned behavior F Marcinkowski, J Metag Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11 (2), 151-168, 2014 | 83 | 2014 |
Audience segments in environmental and science communication: Recent findings and future perspectives J Metag, MS Schäfer Environmental Communication 12 (8), 995-1004, 2018 | 76 | 2018 |
How journalists verify user-generated content during terrorist crises. Analyzing Twitter communication during the Brussels attacks A Rauchfleisch, X Artho, J Metag, S Post, MS Schäfer Social Media+ Society 3 (3), 2056305117717888, 2017 | 74 | 2017 |
Journalists’ Use of Political Tweets. Functions for journalistic work and the role of perceived influences J Metag, A Rauchfleisch Digital Journalism, 2016 | 63 | 2016 |
Content Analysis Methods for Assessing Climate Change Communication and Media Portrayals J Metag Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science, 2016 | 63* | 2016 |
Who wants to be a citizen scientist? Identifying the potential of citizen science and target segments in Switzerland T Füchslin, MS Schäfer, J Metag Public Understanding of Science 28 (6), 652-668, 2019 | 58 | 2019 |
Predicting public trust in science: The role of basic orientations toward science, perceived trustworthiness of scientists, and experiences with science F Wintterlin, F Hendriks, NG Mede, R Bromme, J Metag, MS Schäfer Frontiers in Communication 6, 822757, 2022 | 53 | 2022 |
Selling science 2.0: What scientific projects receive crowdfunding online? MS Schäfer, J Metag, J Feustle, L Herzog Public Understanding of Science 27 (5), 496-514, 2018 | 52 | 2018 |
Rezeption und Wirkung öffentlicher Wissenschaftskommunikation J Metag Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation, 251-274, 2017 | 45 | 2017 |
Brute force effects of mass media presence and social media activity on electoral outcome M Kovic, A Rauchfleisch, J Metag, C Caspar, J Szenogrady Social Media Campaigning in Europe, 56-79, 2020 | 43 | 2020 |
Hochschulen zwischen Social Media-Spezialisten und Online-Verweigerern. Eine Analyse der Online-und Social Media-Kommunikation promotionsberechtigter Hochschulen in Deutschland … J Metag, MS Schäfer SCM Studies in Communication and Media 6 (2), 160-195, 2017 | 43 | 2017 |
Forschungsfeld Hochschulkommunikation B Fähnrich, J Metag, S Post, MS Schäfer Springer VS, 2019 | 41 | 2019 |
Strategic, structural, and individual determinants of online campaigning in German elections J Metag, F Marcinkowski Policy & Internet 4 (3-4), 136-158, 2012 | 39 | 2012 |
Audiences of science communication between pluralisation, fragmentation and polarisation MS Schäfer, J Metag Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology, 291-304, 2021 | 36 | 2021 |