| Understanding the effects of biotic and abiotic factors on sources of aquatic environmental DNA K Stewart Biodiversity and Conservation, 2019 | 155 | 2019 |
| Stress, song and survival in sparrows SA MacDougall-Shackleton, L Dindia, AEM Newman, DA Potvin, ... Biology letters 5 (6), 746-748, 2009 | 101 | 2009 |
| Rapid biodegradation of atrazine by Ensifer sp. strain and its degradation genes L Ma, S Chen, J Yuan, P Yang, Y Liu, K Stewart International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 116, 133-140, 2017 | 95 | 2017 |
| Trade‐offs between reducing complex terminology and producing accurate interpretations from environmental DNA: Comment on “Environmental DNA: What's behind the term?” by … N Rodriguez‐Ezpeleta, O Morissette, CW Bean, S Manu, P Banerjee, ... Molecular Ecology 30 (19), 4601-4605, 2021 | 76 | 2021 |
| Evaluating monitoring options for conservation: comparing traditionaland environmental DNA tools for a critically endangered mammal C Qu, K Stewart The Science of Nature 106, 2019 | 56 | 2019 |
| Using environmental DNA to assess population-wide spatiotemporal reserve use JZ Kathryn Stewart, Hongjuan Ma, Jinsong Zheng Conservation Biology, 2017 | 52 | 2017 |
| Characterization, optimization, and validation of environmental DNA (eDNA) markers to detect an endangered aquatic mammal H Ma, K Stewart, S Lougheed, J Zheng, Y Wang, J Zhao Conservation Genetics Resources 8, 561-568, 2016 | 47 | 2016 |
| Local song elements indicate local genotypes and predict physiological condition in song sparrows Melospiza melodia KA Stewart, EA MacDougall-Shackleton Biology Letters 4 (3), 240-242, 2008 | 47 | 2008 |
| The rich get richer: song complexity predicts song element sharing and song output in song sparrows Melospiza melodia EA MacDougall-Shackleton, KA Stewart, DA Potvin, E Tennenhouse Animal Behaviour 78 (1), 141-146, 2009 | 35 | 2009 |
| Plant–animal interactions in the era of environmental DNA (eDNA)—a review P Banerjee, KA Stewart, CM Antognazza, IV Bunholi, K Deiner, ... Environmental DNA 4 (5), 987-999, 2022 | 25 | 2022 |
| Contact zone dynamics during early stages of speciation in a chorus frog (Pseudacris crucifer) KA Stewart, JD Austin, KR Zamudio, SC Lougheed Heredity 116 (2), 239-247, 2016 | 22 | 2016 |
| Comparing fish prey diversity for a critically endangered aquatic mammal in a reserve and the wild using eDNA metabarcoding C Qu, KA Stewart, R Clemente-Carvalho, J Zheng, Y Wang, C Gong, L Ma, ... Scientific Reports 10 (1), 16715, 2020 | 19 | 2020 |
| Extensive variation in sperm morphology in a frog with no sperm competition KA Stewart, R Wang, R Montgomerie BMC Evolutionary Biology 16, 1-11, 2016 | 14 | 2016 |
| Testing for intraspecific postzygotic isolation between cryptic lineages of Pseudacris crucifer KA Stewart, SC Lougheed Ecology and Evolution 3 (14), 4621-4630, 2013 | 14 | 2013 |
| Leveraging eDNA to expand the study of hybrid zones KA Stewart, SA Taylor Molecular Ecology 29 (15), 2768-2776, 2020 | 13 | 2020 |
| Can alternative mating tactics facilitate introgression across a hybrid zone by circumventing female choice? KA Stewart, CM Hudson, SC Lougheed Journal of evolutionary biology 30 (2), 412-421, 2017 | 13 | 2017 |
| The role of genetic diversity in the evolution and maintenance of environmentally-cued, male alternative reproductive tactics KA Stewart, R Draaijer, MR Kolasa, IM Smallegange BMC Evolutionary Biology 19, 1-10, 2019 | 10 | 2019 |
| Environmental DNA and its application in protecting aquatic ecosystems. H Ma, K Stewart, L Ma, W Ren, Z Jianfu Chinese Journal of Ecology 35 (2), 516-523, 2015 | 10 | 2015 |
| Environmental DNA analysis as an emerging non-destructive method for plant biodiversity monitoring: a review P Banerjee, KA Stewart, G Dey, CM Antognazza, RK Sharma, JP Maity, ... AoB Plants 14 (4), plac031, 2022 | 9 | 2022 |
| Evidence for a third male type in a male-dimorphic model species KA Stewart, TPG Van den Beuken, FT Rhebergen, JA Deere, ... Ecology 99 (7), 1685-1687, 2018 | 9 | 2018 |
