| Judicial supervision of individual settlements with class members in Australia, Canada, and the United States V Morabito Tex. Int'l LJ 38, 663, 2003 | 56 | 2003 |
| Class Actions: The Right to Opt Out Under Part IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)'(1994) V Morabito Melbourne University Law Review 19, 615, 0 | 39* | |
| Clashing Classes Down Under - Evaluating Australia's Competing Class Actions through Empirical and Comparative Perspectives V Morabito Connecticut Journal of International Law 27, 245-318, 2012 | 30 | 2012 |
| Clashing Classes Down Under - Evaluating Australia's Class Actions Competing Class Actions through Empirical and Comparative Perspectives V Morabito Conn. J. Int'l L. 27, 245-318, 2011 | 30* | 2011 |
| Public vs Private Enforcement of Securities Laws: An Australian Empirical Study V Welsh, Michelle and Morabito Journal of Corporate Law Studies 14, 39-78, 2014 | 28 | 2014 |
| Collective Forms of Consumer Redress: Financial Ombudsman Service Case Study V Waye, V Morabito Journal of Corporate Law Studies 12, 1-32, 2012 | 28 | 2012 |
| Class Actions Instituted only for the Benefit of the Clients of the Class Representative’s Solicitors V Morabito Sydney Law Review 29, 5-41, 2007 | 28 | 2007 |
| An Australian Perspective on Class Action Settlements”(2006) V Morabito Modern Law Review 69, 347, 0 | 25* | |
| Can Class Action Regimes Operate Satisfactorily without a Certification Device? Empirical Insights from the Federal Court of Australia J Caruana, V Morabito American Journal of Comparative Law 61 (3), 579-615, 2013 | 22 | 2013 |
| Ideological Plaintiffs and Class Actions–An Australian Perspective’(2001) V Morabito University of British Columbia Law Review 34, 459, 0 | 17 | |
| Class Actions Against Multiple Respondents’(2002) V Morabito Federal Law Review 30, 295, 0 | 15 | |
| An Empirical Study of Appeals by Class Members in Australia’s Federal Class Actions V Morabito Common Law World Review 42, 240-268, 2013 | 14 | 2013 |
| The Federal Court of Australia's Power to Terminate Properly Instituted Class Actions V Morabito Osgoode Hall LJ 42, 473, 2004 | 14 | 2004 |
| Federal class actions, contingency fees, and the rules governing litigation costs V Morabito Monash UL Rev. 21, 231, 1995 | 14 | 1995 |
| Federal Class Actions, Contingency Fees, and the Rules Governing Litigation Costs"(1995) V Morabito Mon LR 21, 231 at 231, 0 | 10 | |
| The Dawning of the Age of the Litigation Entrepreneur V Waye, V Morabito Civil Justice Quarterly 28, 389-433, 2009 | 8 | 2009 |
| What is a Tax? The Erosion of the" Latham Definition"’(1996) V Morabito, S Barkoczy Revenue Law Journal 6, 43, 1938 | 8 | 1938 |
| Security for costs in unfunded federal class actions: back to the future V Morabito, N Hatcher Australian Law Journal 92 (2), 105-126, 2018 | 7 | 2018 |
| Reining in Litigation Entrepreneurs – A New Zealand Proposal V Morabito, V Waye New Zealand Law Review, 323-362, 2011 | 7 | 2011 |
| Dinning v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation-The Dawn of a New Era in Tax Litigation in Australia V Morabito Canterbury L. Rev. 7, 487, 1998 | 7 | 1998 |
Vicki WayeProfessor of Law, University of South AustraliaVerified email at unisa.edu.au
