Permissible killing: The self-defence justification of homicide S Uniacke Cambridge University Press, 1994 | 238 | 1994 |
Why is revenge wrong? S Uniacke J. Value Inquiry 34, 61, 2000 | 115 | 2000 |
How should we understand family-centred care? S Uniacke, TK Browne, L Shields Journal of child health care 22 (3), 460-469, 2018 | 94 | 2018 |
Proportionality and self-defense S Uniacke Law and Philosophy 30 (3), 253-272, 2011 | 48 | 2011 |
Was Mary's death murder S Uniacke Med. L. Rev. 9, 208, 2001 | 39 | 2001 |
Reasonable prospect of success S Uniacke How We Fight: Ethics in War, 62, 2014 | 29 | 2014 |
Reasonable prospect of success S Uniacke How We Fight: Ethics in War, 62, 2014 | 29 | 2014 |
In vitro fertilization and the right to reproduce S Uniacke Bioethics 1 (3), 241-254, 1987 | 29 | 1987 |
The doctrine of double effect SM Uniacke The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review 48 (2), 188-218, 1984 | 29 | 1984 |
On Getting One's Retaliation in First S Uniacke | 22 | 2007 |
Peter Singer and Non‐Voluntary ‘Euthanasia’: tripping down the slippery slope S Uniacke, HJ McCloskey Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (2), 203-219, 1992 | 21 | 1992 |
In Defense of" Permissible Killing": A Response to Two Critics S Uniacke Law and Philosophy, 627-633, 2000 | 15 | 2000 |
Self-Defense and Natural Law S Uniacke Am. J. Juris. 36, 73, 1991 | 15 | 1991 |
The child’s right to a voice D Archard, S Uniacke Res Publica 27 (4), 521-536, 2021 | 13 | 2021 |
Emotional excuses S Uniacke Law & Phil. 26, 95, 2007 | 13 | 2007 |
Responsibility: Intention and consequence S Uniacke The Routledge Companion to Ethics, 596-606, 2010 | 12 | 2010 |
The doctrine of double effect S Uniacke Bull. Austl. Soc. Leg. Phil., 2, 1980 | 11 | 1980 |
Respect for Autonomy in Medical Ethics S Uniacke Reading Onora O'Neill, 94-110, 2013 | 10 | 2013 |
Emotional excuses’(2007) S Uniacke Law and Philosophy 26, 95, 0 | 10 | |
Responsibility and obligation: some Kantian directions SM Uniacke International journal of philosophical studies 13 (4), 461-475, 2005 | 9 | 2005 |